High-precision Ads built to capture commercial intent

We buy customers, not just clicks

Intent Targeting

Precision over volume

Traffic volume is a vanity metric; the only truth is Cost Per Conversion. Unlike competitors pushing "Broad Match" for reach, this approach relies on "Exact Match" precision. By filtering out queries like "free templates" or "jobs," the budget targets solely high-intent users, mechanically driving down your acquisition costs by eliminating wasted spend.

Bing Reach

Capture overlooked audiences

Diversify beyond Google. While the industry obsesses over Google, massive value exists elsewhere. With  10% market share in the US and 20% in China, Microsoft reaches professional demographics ignored by competitors. This lower competition environment drastically reduces Cost Per Click (CPC), securing a strategic path to cheaper acquisition costs.

Controlled Bidding

Profit-first automation

Smart Limits. Algorithms need boundaries. We focus on Target ROAS (Return On Ad Spend), meaning the revenue generated for each dollar spent. We set strict bid caps to prevent the system from overpaying for any single click. This discipline ensures your budget secures high-value positions while keeping your acquisition costs predictable and safe.

Technical Tracking

Data-driven truth

Robust Measurement. Implementation of Google Tag Manager and GA4 ensures precise data collection. Rather than tracking simple page views, the focus shifts to specific actions like purchases or lead forms. Tags must fire correctly on all devices to align reporting with actual bank deposits, creating a single source of truth for your financial investment.

Quality Score 

Lower costs through relevance

Relevance lowers costs. Google rewards ads that align perfectly with user searches. Strict matching of ad copy to landing page content improves the Quality Score mechanically. This higher score directly reduces the Cost Per Click (CPC) for the same position, giving your budget more leverage against competitors relying on generic campaigns.

Full Ownership

No hostage accounts

You own the data. Many agencies "lease" campaigns, keeping the history if you leave. We reject this. You retain 100% ownership of the Google Ads account and its data from day one. We build a permanent business asset for your company, ensuring total transparency and freedom to leave with your work intact.

How we work differently

No guesswork, no black boxes, no wasted spend. You track your campaigns live, validate every bid adjustment via data, and scale with transparent revenue reports.

Automation: we still beat computers

The Myth of Forced Automation. Many agencies push Performance Max as the future of Google Ads. Performance Max can automate budget allocation across Search, Display, YouTube, Gmail, Maps, and Discover when you provide full assets - Google's algorithm decides the distribution. LaFactory doesn't use Performance Max. We run manual Search campaigns with precise keyword targeting on Google.com only, excluding Search Network partners that generate mediocre traffic. Every euro stays on high-intent searches where purchase decisions happen. Full control over keywords, bids, and placements. No algorithm confusing "Cambodia" with "Vietnam" and burning budget on irrelevant clicks.

Manual Oversight Beats Algorithmic Spend. Manual campaigns separate each Google channel by user intent. A Google Maps search from someone ready to visit differs fundamentally from a Display banner click during casual browsing. Performance Max automation treats both identically, mixing high-intent and low-intent traffic in the same budget allocation. LaFactory isolates Search campaigns on Google.com only - Search Partners and Display Network stay disabled. Manual bid adjustments and keyword control keep acquisition costs predictable. The machine chases volume anywhere it can spend. Human oversight recognizes which queries convert and which burn budget, protecting margins instead of optimizing for clicks that never close.

The Optimization Score Trap

Deconstructing Google's Gamification. Google turned account management into a psychological game pushing agencies toward 100% Optimization Score. This gamification makes accounts feel underperforming unless you follow automated recommendations. Points reward actions serving Google's revenue, not yours: activating Search Network or broad match keywords. A "perfect" score from Google means overpaying for reach while sacrificing the precision needed for profitable acquisition.

The "Ad Strength" Illusion. Ad Strength ratings (Poor, Average, Good, Excellent) can manipulate through metrics. Google's algorithm evaluates quality based on keyword volume in headlines, sometimes ignoring brand relevance or user intent. "Excellent" ratings can produce repetitive, keyword-stuffed ads that drive clicks but may fail conversions when messaging becomes unreadable. Human copywriting focuses on strategic relevance over algorithm compliance. Once ads reach "Average" rating, the system stops penalizing, allowing focus on conversion rate and message clarity instead of chasing perfect scores.

Ignoring Google's Optimization Suggestions.
Google Ads pushes automated recommendations that expand targeting and increase daily spend. "Suggestions" to add broad match keywords, enable Display expansion, or raise budgets maximize Google's ad inventory sales, not your ROI. LaFactory refuses these recommendations. Campaigns stay narrow - exact match keywords, Search Network only, manual bid control. Google's optimization score drops because the platform wants broader reach and higher budgets. Lower scores mean tighter control. Every euro concentrates on purchase-intent queries instead of spreading across Google's automated expansion mechanisms designed to sell more impressions.

Keyword Architecture & Volume Thresholds

Navigating the Search Volume Trap. Keyword Planner data reveals the "Low Search Volume" trap. Google blocks keywords below approximately 100 monthly searches from triggering ads, effectively killing ultra-specific targeting. Ghost keywords sit inactive in accounts, never reaching auctions. Keywords must stay above algorithmic floor limits to generate impressions while maintaining relevance to actual business offers.

The Broad Match & Synonym Scam. Google's Broad Match became a trap. It doesn't match keywords - it targets "loosely related" concepts and synonyms wildly irrelevant to business goals. The 2025 algorithm treats "dog" as synonym for "cat," or "motorcycle" for "scooter," based on vague category associations. This expansion drains budgets on traffic with zero purchase intent. Manual audits of every match type prevent linguistic drift, keeping spend on exact queries instead of Google's creative interpretations.

RSA Headline Strategy. Responsive Search Ads allow 15 headlines. The machine guesses with weak copy if left alone. Providing 15 distinct variations of value propositions, then monitoring which combinations Google's AI favors based on performance data, feeds the system quality inputs. This leverages machine testing power without surrendering brand message control. The final combination shown to users maximizes click-through rate instead of diluting message with algorithm-generated mediocrity.

Negative Keyword Warfare & Bing Strategy

Aggressive Exclusion Strategy. Google expands search terms to broad synonyms, wasting budget on irrelevant traffic. Protection requires daily audits of search reports. Every non-converting query gets manually blocked. Automated systems prioritize volume over quality. Manual filtering blocks non-buyers: job seekers searching "marketing jobs," bargain hunters typing "free marketing tools," students researching "marketing definition." Ads appear only for purchase-intent queries.

The Microsoft Advertising Opportunity. Proven Google structures duplicate to Microsoft Advertising for incremental reach. Bing's network reaches older, affluent audiences shopping from corporate workstations. Lower competition can reduce CPCs 30-50% in many industries, though retail and some sectors see comparable or higher costs than Google. Same campaign structure, same negative keywords, additional revenue stream. Market expansion without rebuilding strategy from scratch.

Manual Integrity Verification. Most agencies use automated sync between Google and Microsoft Advertising. Recurring sync creates budget overrides - Microsoft resets daily budgets to match Google without warning. Location targeting expands beyond intended geography. Settings auto-selected during import can delete existing campaigns or overwrite bid adjustments. Platform updates change behaviors mid-campaign.

LaFactory imports Google campaigns once, then manages Microsoft independently. Every campaign gets manual verification of budgets, negative keywords, location targets, and bid caps before launch. No recurring sync means no surprise overwrites when Microsoft changes import defaults. Manual control catches platform shifts before they drain budget